abril 8, 2010

3 Tips for Managing Your Online Reputation

Laptop ImageAntony Mayfield is iCrossing’s Senior Vice President, Social Media, leading the company’s services and innovation efforts related to the social web. He is also the author of Me and My Web Shadow, a newly released everyperson’s guide to the social web. You can find him on his blog or Twitter.

The measure of your reputation is what you do plus what others say about you. That was one of the first things I learned in PR. A reputation can be managed, and can be influenced by the things we do, but it can never be designed or decided upon by its holder. Reputation is earned.

As the social web has distributed the power and influence formerly held by the mainstream media, it has created the need for personal reputation awareness. And despite being a long-time user of social media, I found I learned some new things as I navigated these waters for myself. Below are three tips that I found useful.


1. You Are Your Network


In the course of writing my book, I had a call from a BBC researcher asking for background on social networks. The breaking story that day was that personal details and embarrassing photos of the newly appointed head of Britain’s foreign intelligence service, MI6, were splashed all over one newspaper. The source? His family’s Facebook profiles.

It made me think about my own family’s personal details and images. What if I became a story? What would a journalist find? My profile’s privacy settings were locked down, but sure enough, a few clicks showed that my wife’s was wide open.

It was a clear lesson: If you want to manage privacy, reputation, and your security to any extent, you have to think about those around you — especially those who are not as tech-savvy.


2. If You Can’t Delete, Compete


Office Party ImageAlthough it’s a good idea to ask people to remove embarrassing content about you, in the majority of cases the best course is to make sure that you are the first and best source of information about yourself appearing on Google and other major search engines. “Crowding out,” or pushing that embarrassing party photo down in the search rank can be achieved over time. This approach is best combined with an ethos of developing a thicker skin.

The time may soon come when so much content about our lives is online that we get suspicious if we find no unpolished or slightly embarrassing bits about someone when we look. Why are they so perfect? What are they hiding?

Reputation is a messy and uneven business. Playing the content game is often preferable to an all out war — a battle you will most likely lose.


3. There’s a Cottage Industry Around “Reputation Protection”


In discussing online reputation with friends and colleagues, they predicted that there would be services that offer “the digital equivalent of tattoo removal.” While I didn’t doubt that there would be demand for this kind of thing, I wondered about how it would be realistically implemented.

There is, in fact, a small industry growing up to help people manage how their privacy is affected by the web. At the high end, rich and powerful celebrities now hire digital security specialists to help them lock down everything from their voicemail inbox, to their e-mail and Facebook accounts, and to look for the weak points where stalkers or prying journalists might try to get some juicy information.

For the rest of us, a host of services promise to safeguard your identity and reputation online — I even get one service free with my credit card. It tells me less than my Google Alerts, though, so I’m broadly skeptical about the effectiveness of services like this. At best, they should be combined with an effort to develop personal web literacy and an understanding of how to manage online reputation responsibly.


Conclusion


It is incredibly important that we help our friends, colleagues and families understand the social web. They make up our most valuable social networks. And when you understand networks, you understand that their success and well-being is intrinsically linked to your own.

As Howard Rheingold says, “What you know or don’t know about networks can influence how much freedom, wealth and participation you and your children will have in the rest of this century.”

It should be the goal of every web-savvy professional to have their online reputation precede them.


For more social media coverage, follow Mashable Social Media on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook



More social media resources from Mashable:


- 4 Steps for Managing Social Media Attention
- How 5 Brands Are Mastering the Game of Foursquare
- Zen and the Art of Twitter: 4 Tips for Productive Tweeting
- The Tao of Tweeting
- 4 Tips for Reducing Social Media Stress

Images courtesy of iStockphoto, danwilton, tingberg


Reviews: Facebook, Google, Twitter, iStockphoto

Tags: facebook, List, Lists, online reputation, social media, tips, twitter

marzo 26, 2010

Louis Vuitton VS. Google: The Importance of Online Reputation ManagementSearch Engine People Blog

After a long 7 years Google rang the victory bell over a trademark lawsuit with LMVH (responsible for the Louis Vuitton brand) this past Tuesday, March 23. Ever since this lawsuit caught my eye a while back I have been pondering why they decided to take this approach instead of doing the obvious: online reputation management.

In case you’re not up-to-speed on the case, here’s a quick overview.

In 2003 LMVH sued Google in French courts and eventually won in 2005. This led to Google paying over $400,000 USD for trademark infringement. LMVH’s beef was with ads selling Louis Vuitton replicas being shown when someone Googled “Louis Vuitton”. They were choked that Google would be selling the Louis Vuitton trademark to third parties – specifically websites selling counterfeits.

Google then took the case to the European Union’s highest courts where the battle continued for another 5 years until the ruling was made this past Tuesday, March 23 in Google’s favor. The courts stated that Google had not infringed trademark law by allowing advertisers to purchase keywords matching competitors’ trademarks.

Will the Real LV Please Stand Up

When I search for Loius Vuitton on Google (in British Columbia, Canada), one search result is for the authentic Louis Vuitton site, one is a Wikipedia entry for Louis Vuitton, and the other 8 are selling Louis Vuitton replicas.

So why is LMVH getting their knickers in a twist over ads when the search results are clearly dominated by people selling replicas? If anything, these search results most likely have a higher clickthrough rate then any AdWords campaign.

Money Well Spent?

How much do you think LMVH has paid in legal fees these past 7 years? Wouldn't they have been better off tackling an aggressive online reputation management campaign with that money? There are professionals out there that specialize in this type of thing you know.

Yes a lot of people sell Louis Vuitton replicas. But a lot of people also sell Chanel knockoffs and they seem to be doing pretty well in the SERPs. When I Googled "Chanel" only one knockoff company showed up in the results. So it is possible for the Louis Vuitton brand to do the same thing. Yes it can be costly, but it can’t be more than they’ve paid for a 7 year battle with Google in the courts.

What They Should Do

The following are some online reputation tactics that Louis Vuitton can benefit from. Since they can not control AdWords results, they can at least try to reclaim back organic search results for their name.

Subdomains

Only two pages from a domain can rank in the search results, however, search engines treat subdomains as unique websites. By developing content on subdomains, Louis Vuitton can have multiple sites that rank for their domain name. A blog, for example, can be one example of a subdomain.

New Domains

Louis Vuitton has a couple of options for new domains they can build up through link building methods. They are involved with nautical events and hold the Louis Vuitton Pacific Series and the Louis Vuitton Cup. They also hold the Louis Vuitton Classic for automobile collectors every year. Those are two separate sites that would work well.

Then there is Espace Louis Vuitton. It produces and hosts three exhibitions per year, around the themes of travel, heritage, art and fashion. It is a popular attraction that attracts more than 10 000 visitors for each exhibition. Once again, they have another opportunity here to create a branded website.

Affiliations & Distribution

Currently only Louis Vuitton stores are authorized to sell their products. What if they follow suit with other successful luxury brands and find high-end stores to officially sell their brand?

With this method they can create landing pages on sites that distribute their products and help along with link building. Although it may take away from their exclusivity, it will also prevent them from being overtaken by replicas in search results. They have proven that they obviously care about their online presence by taking Google to court in the first place.

Social Media

Louis Vuitton can also benefit from doing a little social networking. Like creating a Twitter account (and hiring someone to run it properly), or putting some of their fashion show clips up on YouTube. Outspoken Media has a thorough Online Reputation Management Guide that covers all the angles of the social media approach.

If all of this sounds like a lot of work, it is. But it is a small price to pay for Louis Vuitton to take over search results currently dominated by fakes. It will also most likely have a better ROI then taking Google to court.

———————————————————————————————————

Stephanie Woods is an internet marketer living in Kelowna, BC with over 10 years experience with advertising and marketing. You can reach Steph at her internet marketing blog or on Twitter.

Post from: Search Engine People SEO Blog

Louis Vuitton VS. Google: The Importance of Online Reputation Management

marzo 10, 2010

Gestiona tu Reputación Online: monitoriza (y III)eTc :: El blog de Marketing en Español

monitorización
Después de un tiempo he conseguido ponerme con esta tercera y última parte sobre un aspecto importante a la hora de abordar la Gestión de la Reputación Online, que es la monitorización. En el primero de la serie vimos una aproximación al concepto de Reputación Online; mientras que en el segundo abordamos algunos consejos a la hora de medir, algunas ideas sobre qué se puede medir y cómo optimizar el entorno disponible.

Así que hoy nos centramos ya en el meollo de la cuestión, que queda recogido de manera muy visual en la presentación que acompaña al post (tal como hicimos en el anterior), porque creo que es la mejor manera de explicar lo mejor de cada herramienta. Como ejemplo he utilizado los resultados de Innosfera, un evento mensual sobre innovación, promovido por la UOC, y que organizo junto a Javier Velilla y María Jesús Alonso.

En primer lugar, debemos plantearnos si utilizar las herramientas de pago disponibles (en ocasiones si contamos con presupuesto suficiente es recomendable), ya que facilitan la tarea de organizar todo en un lugar, obtener gráficos, etc. Existen muchas, muy especializadas en el Mercado anglosajón, como Radian6, Trackur (recientemente ha sacado una versión gratuita que os aconsejo probar), BuzzStream, Syntesio, Visible Measures…, y nos aburriríamos mencionándolas todas.


Como comentaba, tienen una importante carencia a la hora de monitorizar la web en español. En nuestro país existen también interesantes opciones como Smmart (de Cierzo Development), MambaIQ, la recientemente lanzada “Webrunner 2.0”, una herramienta que he probado y que es muy interesante debido a la amplitud de sitios que monitoriza y a su foco en la web en español.

Por otra lado, tenemos multitud de herramientas gratuitas disponibles en la web, que como tales demuestran sus carencias y no son perfectas. Sin embargo, la combinación de las idóneas nos proporciona excelentes resultados. Para optimizarlas, veremos una selección de aquéllas que muestran resultados aceptables y que permiten la suscripción a las búsquedas de los resultados mediante RSS.

1.- Elige tus “keywords” o listado de palabras clave que te permitan acudir a cada herramienta para realizar la búsqueda y gestionar la suscripción. Algunas ideas pueden ser:

  • Directivos
  • Empresa, filiales…
  • Marcas, nombres de productos, servicios…
  • Slogan (“la chispa de la vida”…)
  • Competencia
  • Sector
  • Proveedores, clientes, socios, etc.

2.- Gestionar los resultados en lectores de RSS:

Como hemos visto lo importante es seleccionar herramientas que permitan suscribirse a los resultados de la búsqueda mediante RSS. Herramientas de lectura hay muchísimas, sin embargo, las más recomendables son:

  • Google Reader: si creamos una cuenta específica para lo que queremos monitorizar puede ser una interesante herramienta. Aunque visualmente mucho más pobre que otras.
  • Netvibes: una excelente herramienta para agrupar en un solo lugar y mediante widgets los resultados de cada herramienta que utilicemos.
  • Feedly: una herramienta también muy visual y que tiene una ventaja, nos va discriminando los resultados de las fuentes que vayamos considerando menos relevantes.
  • Yahoo! Pipes: uno de los problemas a los que nos vamos a hacer frente es la repetición de resultados, ya que muchas herramientas muestra resultados similares. Una adecuada gestión de Pipes nos permite optimizar los resultados y evitar repeticiones.

monitorización2
3.- Herramientas:

Para llevar un orden a la hora de gestionarlas y controlarlas, una interesante división sería:

  • Alertas de Noticias
  • Blogs
  • Comentarios y conversaciones
  • Social Media
  • Marcadores
  • Twitter

3.1.- Alertas de noticias: en este campo Google News Alerts es sin duda la gran referencia. Nos permite recibir alertas al mail o al lector de feeds (RSS), así como introducir otros parámetros de interés como frecuencia, tipo, longitud del mensaje, etc.

3.2.- Blogs:

  • Google Blog Search: nos permite ordenar por relevancia o por fecha, así como establecer parámetros de búsqueda de publicación de resultados (última hora, últimas 12 horas…)
  • BlogPulse: una excelente herramienta gratuita de Nielsen. En portada ofrece resultados centrados en EEUU, por lo que la parte que nos interesa es el buscador. Ofrece interesante opciones como gráficos, búsqueda en conversaciones, búsquedas por url concreta o por fechas…
  • IceRocket: otra de las recomendables a la hora de realizar búsquedas en blogs (aunque también permite buscar en la web, noticias, en Twitter…) Podemos realizar búsquedas por fecha y por idioma, además en la opción “Results Trend”, nos muestra un gráfico sobre la evolución del termino elegido.
  • Twingly: muy útil para buscar en blogs y en Twitter. Permite además agregarte la búsqueda a la barra del navegador, crear una alerta por mail o incluir un widget en tu blog con los resultados. Para realizar búsquedas en Twitter es muy interesante ya que amplia los resultados en el tiempo a mucho más de un mes como suele ser habitual en otros buscadores de Twitter.
  • SocialMention: quizá una de las mejores para realizar búsquedas en la web social, no sólo en blogs. Sin embargo, la incluyo en este epígrafe porque es una de las que muestra un mayor número de resultados en blogs, así como otras opciones relacionadas con la búsqueda como “top keywords”, “top users”, “sentiment”…

3.3.- Comentarios y conversaciones: aquí analizamos las herramientas que nos permiten buscar en los comentarios de los blogs o en foros, en éstos últimos debemos emplear varias herramientas ya que ninguna muestra unos resultados óptimos.

  • BlogPulse.
  • Google Blogs.
  • Backtype: específica para búsquedas de comentarios. No aporta muchos resultados, pero como complemento es interesante. Se ha renovado y también muestra resultados de Twitter.
  • BoardReader: herramienta que nos permite realizar búsquedas en foros.
  • Omgili: al igual que la anterior centrada en búsquedas en foros.
  • BoardTracker.

3.4.- Social Media: aunque herramientas hay muchas y muy útiles, hemos elegido sólo aquellas que permiten la suscripción a los resultados mediante RSS o alertas.

  • SocialMention.
  • El buscador de FriendFeed: muy interesante, ya que nos muestra resultados de todos los servicios de la web social que añaden los usuarios a sus perfiles.
  • Samepoint: muy útil para realizar búsquedas muy completas, ya que incluye resultados de LinkedIn, Facebook, Wikipedia, etc. Un consejo, tiende a mostrar resultados de EEUU, por lo que si introducís una única palabra hacerlo entre comillas para focalice en España (Ej.: “innosfera”)
  • Ubervu: realiza búsquedas muy amplias, muestra gráficos… Permite la suscripción a los resultados mediante alertas de correo electrónico.

3.4. Marcadores: me parece destacable incluir este apartado aparte, ya que Delicious es una interesante herramienta para analizar la repercusión de tus menciones, cómo te etiqueta la gente, quién lo hace…

3.5.- Twitter: sin duda Twitter merece una mención aparte, por su implicación en la conversación, en la web en tiempo real… Entorno a Twitter tenemos miles y miles de herramientas y probablemente mejores de las que he seleccionado; en este caso hemos ampliado a otras que no posibilitan suscripción RSS, pero que sí nos permiten extraer datos interesantes de la conversación.

  • Search.twitter.com: permite la suscripción de resultados por RSS y la búsqueda por idioma.
  • Twazzup: a pesar de que no permite suscripción, es muy interesante porque nos muestra imágenes, noticias, usuarios… que tienen más relación con el término introducido.
  • TweetVolume: Nos muestra gráficamente el volumen de resultados en Twitter de una palabra concreta, permite comparativas con varias palabras.
  • Backtweets: una herramienta muy útil, ya que nos permite introducir una URL y ver qué tweets lindan hacia ella, aunque en el texto no aparezca una palabra clave que busquemos. Permite suscribirnos a los resultados mediante RSS.
  • Trendistic: para analizar evolución de menciones a una palabra en concreto en el tiempo. Nos muestra resultados de la última semana, aunque en su home sí que analizan mucho más en el tiempo.
  • TweetBeep: nos permite recibir en el mail una alerta cada vez que se menciona una palabra que seleccionamos en Twitter.

Ahora toca ponerse en marcha. Gestionar todos los resultados hacia nuestro lector de RSS y tener en un solo lugar toda la información disponible, de manera que no tengamos que acudir a cada herramienta cada vez que queramos buscar información sobre algo en concreto. Os dejo a continuación la presentación:

_______________________________________________________________________________

territoriocreativoRoberto Carreras trabaja como consultor de comunicación 2.0, además es profesor colaborador en la Universidad Antonio de Nebrija. Puedes seguirle en su blog, en twitter y en sus aportaciones en Yorokobu.

noviembre 6, 2009

Study Reveals That Online Searches Affect Emotions, Memory

If you’re not creating great content to help your company get found online, you’re missing an incredible opportunity to legitimately connect with people searching for information related to your industry or product.

According to a new study from the University of Missouri, out of the 73% of American adults who use the internet daily,  over half of them emotionally responded and remembered content that they found “searching” instead of “surfing.” 

This data, published as “The Effect of Searching Versus Surfing on Cognitive and Emotional Responses to Online News” in the Journal of Media Psychology, should be an immediate motivator for any business interested in driving highly qualified leads through SEO. This study absolutely confirms that companies creating quality content that meet the informational needs of readers (rather than only their entertainment needs) have a greater chance of connecting emotionally to potential customers. Companies can then leverage this emotional connection to nurture leads and drive their customers to complete an action on their site.

Unfortunately, though the data presented in the study is very interesting, the marketing takeaway in the University of Missouri article appears to incorrectly recommend Outbound Marketing tactics instead of Inbound Marketing as a way to get found by people using search.  In the article, Kevin Wise, assistant professor of strategic communication, says that site sponsors should “consider increasing their advertising on pages that tend to be accessed via search engines.”

You should not advertise on pages if you intend to get found in search. You don’t get credit for that traffic. Instead, you should create and search engine optimize your own content so your content can really get found.

The study also found that people remember and understand the information they discover when they conducted specific searches. When you create your content, be sure you create specific content that answers specific questions and use specific keywords that people (looking for answers within your industry) are searching for. This way you not only get found in organic search by the people you’re looking to attract, but really make an impression in their memory.

 

SEO for Lead Generation Kit

Learn more about how you can optimize your site to get found online in search engines to generate more leads for your business.

Download our search engine optimization for lead generation kit.

 

Become a Fan on Facebook
Get inside info and advance notice of HubSpot's free marketing webinars, ebooks and more. Click here –>

 hubspot facebook fans